Why is India reactive and not proactive against Pakistan?

Homepage      About me      Contact me     Privacy policy

One of those questions that has been posed to every elected Hindustani government is 'why do we have no first attack policy', 'why do we wait for Porkis to attack?' This post will answer such questions.

Pakistan is like a mischievous brat which keeps on troubling its sensible big brother India. Let's see how Pakistan developed after independence:

For a long time of Pakistan's post independence period, Pakistan has been ruled by its military. Democratically elected governments have struggled to complete their terms, being alternately dismissed by presidents or removed from power by army chiefs.

Indeed, only one parliament has ever completed its five-year term - and it was headed by General Pervez Musharraf, a military dictator, as both president and army chief.

So, Pakistani intellects lack power and are easily suppressed by its military when they try to raise any sensible opinions. Pakistani army tries to get popular public support to stay in power by condemning India and conducting frequent attacks on India. Let me give you an example, Nawaz Sharif was losing from India on diplomatic grounds, so military started condemning him to get back in power. So, even he has to continue with his frequent attacks on India. This is the reason for the frequent attacks from the Pakistani side.

Now let's talk about India. India is the one of the fastest growing economy with a good world standing. It has got enough sensible intellectuals who understand that war is never a good option because even the victor has to lose it's earlier powerful standing. So, India is reactive and not pro-active.

India knows that if India will become pro-active then the weak Pakistani government will be forced to declare a full scale war and a war has no victors.Even though Pakistan may vanish from the world map, India will also get weakened which could be exploited by other world powers.

Read more articles at :
Home