The final conclusion

Homepage       About me    Contact me   Privacy policy

There is now a mountain of scientific evidence that proves that the Aryan Invasion Theory or its migration version is a myth. It is fiction. It belongs in the big league of unscientific theories (which some still believe in), alongside creationism, anti-evolutionism, the myth of Noah’s ark, and flat earth theory.

The evidence shows that India is much more than a nation. It is the world’s oldest civilization.

India wasn’t born in 1947. Our great civilization was born at least nine and a half millennia ago according to archaeological evidence, and fifteen and a half millennia ago according to genetic evidence. The records of our great ancestors’ deeds are lost, destroyed in the fires and the depredations of the past millennium. The least we can do to honor our ancestors is to strive to rediscover the truth about them.

The truth is out there. Its clues lie buried under our footsteps, scattered in our languages and our literature, and hidden deep in our DNA. Science is the key. We now possess the know-how and the technology to investigate and unravel the mystery. It is time to utilize it.

India’s rediscovery of its past has only begun. Exciting times are ahead.

Previous article: What needs to be done?

Those who are still not satisfied can read the interview of renowned archaeologist and former Director General of the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) Brij Basi Lal, popularly known as B. B. Lal:
(Interview)

More Articles:

Home

Buddha was born in Nepal then why do Indians claim that he was from India?

Homepage    About me      Contact me    Privacy policy

One of the hot questions posed to Indians after the anti-Indian wave in Nepal is that 'Buddha was Nepali and not Indian, then why do Indians claim him?'. Few idiots have been flooding the social media with the same kind of question, where India and Indians were hurled abuse just because Indians own Buddha as much as (if not more than) Nepal do. So, let's answer this question.

'Siddhartha was Nepali but Buddha was Indian.'- This is what I claim. I will back my claim with facts and then you can decide for yourselves.

• Place where he meditated, attained enlightenment & became Lord Buddha -Bodhgaya(India)

• Place where he delivered his first sermon - Sarnath(India)
• Places where he preached Buddhism -Gangetic Valley(India)
• Place where he died -Kushinagar(India)
• Place where first Buddhist council was held immediately after Lord Buddha’s death - Rajgriha(India)
• Places where second, third and fourth Buddhist council were held - Vaishali, Patliputra, & Kundalvan ( India). These Buddhist councils set up the future discourse of Buddhism.
• It was because of Indian King Ashoka that Buddhism spread in South Asia. Modern day Nepal didn't even exist at that time. It was under his rule that time.

                  

Buddhists visiting Nepal -9 Lakhs, Buddhists visiting BodhGaya alone -20 Lakhs. There are many other important sites of Buddhism in India. I am not even counting them.

So, I guess it's not only Indians, but the entire world sees India as the Land of Buddha and Buddhism.

Read more articles:

Home